PDA

View Full Version : Bal-Jax Troy Smith Trade


Walter
01-13-2008, 08:44 PM
BAL gets: Jagx 5th(#193)

JAX gets: QB-Troy Smith
49ersfan
01-13-2008, 08:46 PM
Guys, Troy Smith is in going into his second year and would not be traded, which is why I voted no. That said, I think the deal is otherwise fine.
RaidaNation
01-13-2008, 08:52 PM
the reason jags need a qb is they lack in depth.
Garrard will be next yrs starter but backup Quinn Gray is a UFA & there no one after him on the roster
regoob2
01-13-2008, 09:00 PM
^ya but why would the ravens trade its only qb that has any upside.
RaidaNation
01-13-2008, 09:05 PM
true.however, i thought this was a mock draft & meant for fun.If this trade goes down some of these others that have passed should have been shot down as well.
regoob2
01-13-2008, 09:06 PM
Fine.............. i'll vote yes.
RaidaNation
01-13-2008, 09:17 PM
Fine.............. i'll vote yes.

lol, don't make me twist your arm or anything.I'm only being honest here.Over half of these trades would have never gone through.But it's supposed to be fun & fantasy.
Joey_Potter
01-13-2008, 10:48 PM
I vote yes just because
RaidaNation
01-13-2008, 10:50 PM
Guys, Troy Smith is in going into his second year and would not be traded, which is why I voted no. That said, I think the deal is otherwise fine.

so what.you were gonna trade manny lawson.what does that have to do w/ anything?
Matt McGuire
01-13-2008, 10:51 PM
lol why are people disallowing this trade? What is unfair about it? Baltimore invested a 5th into him last year and trade him for a 5th.

Seems fair he sucks anyways.
RaidaNation
01-13-2008, 10:57 PM
not that he sucks.but i thought they get back their investment.
49ersfan
01-13-2008, 11:06 PM
so what.you were gonna trade manny lawson.what does that have to do w/ anything?

I was going to trade Lawson (a stupid move in hindsight) and I had my trade rejected because Lawson was a young guy. Therefore, this trade shouldn't pass either.
RaidaNation
01-13-2008, 11:10 PM
regardless of hindsight.some of the ppl voting said no just b/c they didn't want to see him leave SF.Those votes & reasons weren't credible enough.
Matt McGuire
01-13-2008, 11:21 PM
I was going to trade Lawson (a stupid move in hindsight) and I had my trade rejected because Lawson was a young guy. Therefore, this trade shouldn't pass either.

San Francisco made a much bigger investment in Lawson than in Smith. Smith also doesn't have much upside as a QB as opposed to Lawson as an OLB.
Joey_Potter
01-13-2008, 11:32 PM
Who knows, Smith could be the next Doug Floutie
Craig Smith
01-14-2008, 08:19 AM
^ya but why would the ravens trade its only qb that has any upside.

Possibly because they are targeting one high in this draft?
RaidaNation
01-14-2008, 09:30 PM
you can veto this trade.i withraw my offer
NoNonsenseCoach
01-15-2008, 02:02 AM
regardless of hindsight.some of the ppl voting said no just b/c they didn't want to see him leave SF.Those votes & reasons weren't credible enough.

I think I was the one that said I didn't want to see him leave San Fran, and I thought I was obviously joking lol.

I see no problem with this trade. Yes it is.
NoNonsenseCoach
01-15-2008, 02:02 AM
Oh man, I tied it up 9-9