
Originally Posted by
scar988
1) it was a legit no-call. The Brady Rule is about the knee. Vilma hit him AS THE BALL WAS IN HIS HANDS. meaning it's a legit tackle. not to mention Vilma was pushed into him.
2) Thomas was legit in the endzone.
3) Bush was legit in the endzone.
4) it was easily a first.
5) PI isn't about if it's uncatchable. It's about when the ball is thrown, whether it is possibly catchable. very subjective. and when the ball was thrown, it was catchable, then Leber tackled the dude.
and for the record. I hate both of these teams. but the Saints won. fair and square. next time, maybe look at Favre's 3 turnovers and tell me it's not the reason why you lost. because it is.
1) Vilma is not in question, sorry but try again when you watch it over.
2) Pierre was down, even Troy "Dallas Homer" Aikman agreed
3) Debatable
4) IDK, I might agree
5) He didn't tackle him. Ball was 2 feet above him.
Overall, try coming at me with an unbiased perspective and then you might make progress. Until then, please go back to your ****hole of a living quarter with your mom and watch sportscenter.
WE GOT A BLACK COACH NOW!! SUPER BOWL BOUND IN 2012, IF THERE IS A LEAGUE!!
I've produced more iconic threads than you ever will :)