Look at the offense around Cam. His #1 WR, and RB are worse than what he has in Carolina. Steve Smith > Julio and JStew/Deangelo > SJax. And the Oline similar in talent. The only positions he has a better supporting cast are as #2 WR and prolly TE if Tony doesn't fall off. I am a big fan of Olsen though so take that as it is. Sure, Burleson is better than whoever Carolina has right now, but is he a difference maker? He really isn't. Even the defense isn't greatly improved over what Cam has. Charles Johnson is better than anyone on that Dline and those ends are nowhere near scary. Cutler would have plenty of time to throw. The LB corp is pretty solid, but are Woodson or Mathis better than Gamble? No. And those safeties are bad. Just about as bad as what Carolina actually has. Is Atogwe that much better than Martin? Also, there is a reason Woodson almost never plays outside anymore. You may not love VJax, but we will take our chances on Woodson and one of those safeties double teaming him on a jump ball. VJax would win that a lot. I love Woodson. He has been one of my favorite Packers for a long time. But he simply isn't very good anymore outside of playing the slot, which he has even started to struggle with.
Now look at Cutler. Our Oline isn't great but still much better than what he currently has. Plus we would scheme, as I mentioned, for the apparent weakness at OT. Our WRs can handle their roles very well and are MUCH MUCH better than what he has been working with in Chicago the past few years. Plus a better TE. We don't have a back as good as Forte, but our two backs can definitely get the job done. We have seen what Cutler can do with the worst supporting cast of any franchise QB. What could he do with very obvious upgrades in both his WRs and Oline?
Sorry if this comes across as homering, but I think these are things that should definitely should be taken into consideration. I look forward to bcb's rebuttal.