If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Maybe I'm just an ignorant ole' wretch, but I don't really get something with this blog's last posting. He started out by saying that he really liked the Bills pickup of Marcus Stroud, which I agree with. He even put this in the "Best" category. Here is what he said.
"The Bills addressed their biggest need in being able to stop the run by trading away third- and fifth-round picks for Marcus Stroud. He was a beast in Jacksonville, and he is a perfect fit in the Bills defense in their one-gap Tampa-2 scheme."
Then directly under them he also has the Jaguars in the "Best" category by getting rid of the same player the aforementioned Bills are praised for getting?!?! Here is what he said.
"Harris got rid of injury-ridden Marcus Stroud for what I think was adequate value. Was it great value? No, but they did get an injury risk off of their roster."
If it was "best" for the Jaguars to get this injury ridden player off their roster why is it also "best" that the Bills picked up this injury ridden player?
It was best for both sides. Stroud was an injury risk for the Jags yes, but he also brings a great presence for the Bills who can afford (or shall I say NEED) to gamble on that injury risk.
Last edited by Matt McGuire; 03-03-2008, 11:42 PM.
2014-2015 Kentucky Wildcats (38-1)
Congrats to Wisconsin. Even more congrats to UK haters.
Comment