Tweet
Bill writes:
walter the ******,
who the **** are you when it comes to the draft and youre smartass comments. go ****in die dude. you were wrong on the rams at #2 with long and had to eat crow and your vendetta shows up with avery. how do you ****in know how good he'll be? the other guys you named all had issues, most notably character ones. we arent going to deal with the early primma donna wideouts who will come to the nfl and do nothing. avery was a great pick over the other guys. you even had him rated predraft as a great get. now because the list you compiled is turned upside down we are terrible. maybe you cant evaluate jackass. let me see who you had ahead of a 3 year starter who runs a 4.3 and put up great numbers; sweed maybe better, jackson-hes an itty bitty guy at 170 no thanks, thomas has had all of 3/4 of a season playing good football vice avery's 3 years, and hardy whom i actually like but if you havent noticed he has some issues and we have drew bennet for that role. do some research you ****in hack before you spout off about what you dont know. youre horse**** you dumb****. go dig ditches youd be better at it pussy.
bill waldron
I respond:
Bill the e-mailer,
Thanks for checking out my site and taking the time to send me an e-mail.
I'm disappointed you don't agree with my draft analysis of the Rams, but I'm a bit confused. You said I was "wrong on the rams at #2 with long..." I had Chris Long in my mock, so I'm not sure where you're getting that from.
Regardless, it seems like your beef with my draft analysis is with Donnie Avery. It's widely known in league circles that the Rams reached for Avery. He was the No. 7 or 8 WR on many lists, and could have been obtained atop Round 3.
But who am I to question the Rams right? After all, they're a sterling 17-34 the last three years, and in that span, almost every single one of their draft picks in the first three rounds has been a bust. Can't say I'm surprised though, as the team had to vote on whom it wanted at No. 2.
Once again, thanks for taking the time to send me your thoughts. I really appreciate it,
Walt
walter the ******,
who the **** are you when it comes to the draft and youre smartass comments. go ****in die dude. you were wrong on the rams at #2 with long and had to eat crow and your vendetta shows up with avery. how do you ****in know how good he'll be? the other guys you named all had issues, most notably character ones. we arent going to deal with the early primma donna wideouts who will come to the nfl and do nothing. avery was a great pick over the other guys. you even had him rated predraft as a great get. now because the list you compiled is turned upside down we are terrible. maybe you cant evaluate jackass. let me see who you had ahead of a 3 year starter who runs a 4.3 and put up great numbers; sweed maybe better, jackson-hes an itty bitty guy at 170 no thanks, thomas has had all of 3/4 of a season playing good football vice avery's 3 years, and hardy whom i actually like but if you havent noticed he has some issues and we have drew bennet for that role. do some research you ****in hack before you spout off about what you dont know. youre horse**** you dumb****. go dig ditches youd be better at it pussy.
bill waldron
I respond:
Bill the e-mailer,
Thanks for checking out my site and taking the time to send me an e-mail.
I'm disappointed you don't agree with my draft analysis of the Rams, but I'm a bit confused. You said I was "wrong on the rams at #2 with long..." I had Chris Long in my mock, so I'm not sure where you're getting that from.
Regardless, it seems like your beef with my draft analysis is with Donnie Avery. It's widely known in league circles that the Rams reached for Avery. He was the No. 7 or 8 WR on many lists, and could have been obtained atop Round 3.
But who am I to question the Rams right? After all, they're a sterling 17-34 the last three years, and in that span, almost every single one of their draft picks in the first three rounds has been a bust. Can't say I'm surprised though, as the team had to vote on whom it wanted at No. 2.
Once again, thanks for taking the time to send me your thoughts. I really appreciate it,
Walt
Comment