Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Here's a thought: Packers trade Rodgers?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 3
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 template Next
  • #1

    Here's a thought: Packers trade Rodgers?

    We already know that Rodgers and Favre can't stay in the same building as it's going to be a media clusterf*** and tear the locker room apart. It's also a media debacle if Favre gets traded unless they can get a 1st or 2nd round pick, which isn't happening.

    However, Rodgers is probably more willing to go to a team like NYJ or Tampa, and would probably command the higher draft pick that the Packers would demand. He may not get the 1st round selection, but I think that this situation is better than any other presented so far.
    - Also known as Dan.
    - Also known as the footballclod, where I do my own fantasy football and other football related stuff. -> www.footballclod.wordpress.com
    Tags: None
  • #2
    something tells me that wont happen lol but it would make more sence i guess
    Brett Favre in 2 years...sigpic

    Comment

    • #3
      I'd rather have Rodgers on the Jets than Favre, but I don't see that happening.
      WalterFootball.com Forum Moderator




      Siena NFL ATS Record(TBD)
      Down LOSING Units Through Week 16

      Comment

      • #4
        Originally posted by vbsiena24 View Post
        I'd rather have Rodgers on the Jets than Favre, but I don't see that happening.
        I guess I would be suprised if you wanted to give up a high draft pick for Rogers considering you have a decent young QB in Clemmens.
        sigpic
        WFB Comments on Vikings @ Steelers Game Rigging
        PuppyPuncher:"It sure was nice enough of Roger Goodell to let the refs from Ark-Florida officiate the Vikings-Steelers game"
        NoNonsenseCoach:"As a Steelers fan living in Pittsburgh I can still admit that tripping penalty was a complete ghost call."
        Simonds:"The tripping call was awful, yes, but there were a number of other absurd calls that went against the Vikings, including a DEFENSIVE delay of game penalty against the Vikings only called after a failed attempt to convert a third and 2 by the Steelers. Even the commentators were utterly floored that the refs made that call."
        Wraith36444:"A shady tripping call on Minnesota essentially gave the game to the Steelers. The Vikings were the better team, but it is too hard to beat a decent team and the refs. Oh and Harvin is the man."
        MaineMan:"I have to agree that it was an awful call and that it changed the outcome. Overall a great game by the Vikes and tragic that the well-deserved victory was stolen away like that."
        PaddyPatriot:"I've seen this play and I have to agree, I can't believe they called it tripping"
        Johndoe:"You know the officiating is bad when a Steeler's fan, like myself, thinks it was pretty bad."
        Steelers_Pens_Fan:"I will admit that the whole "tripping" thing probably shouldn't have been a flag."
        ZN0rseman:"It's great to know that good old fashioned pro football game rigging is still alive and well in America."
        Klunker18:"I'm with Z on this one. Definitely one of those games that makes you wonder if the NFL wants certain teams to win."
        TRICKaz"I agree that was a BS call"
        InjuredReserve:"Have yet to hear anyone say it was the right call. Seems as if the Vikings were cheated a bit."
        Eagles4Life:"Coaches just need to be able to challenge penalties"
        EL_Guapo:"The tripping call was bad, the delay of game was stupid Either way, the Vikings showed they are a top team."
        EllijayFalconsFan:"The tripping penalty was rediculous."
        Archon095:"Even as a Steeler fan I agree that the call was bull."
        BroncosCon:"I'm sorry that was a total bull**** call and it changed the outcome of the game. Pittsburgh still won, but it was almost like Denver winning at Cincy."
        Tony Dungy:"The Vikings are just one bad tripping penalty away from being undefeated.
        Jon Gruden:"That was just a bad, bad call. It cost the Vikings an important win at Pittsburgh, and it could really hurt them in the post season."

        Comment

        • #5
          Shut up Blaze and you shut up right now!

          I'd rather trade Favre to Minnesota for a 7th rounder than get rid of Rodgers.

          Yeah, honestly.

          But if that happened I'd be ****ing PISSED!

          Comment

          • #6
            Great idea. Why don't the Packers trade away the future of their franchise for a quarterback with voices in his head telling him to retire when he's playing and play when he retires?


            R.I.P. Sean Taylor 1983-2007
            HAIL TO THE REDSKINS!

            Comment

            • #7
              Originally posted by MMONTERO View Post
              Great idea. Why don't the Packers trade away the future of their franchise for a quarterback with voices in his head telling him to retire when he's playing and play when he retires?
              Exactly. They'd never trade away Matt Flynn.
              This is my signature.

              Comment

              • #8
                I was talking about Brian Brohm.


                R.I.P. Sean Taylor 1983-2007
                HAIL TO THE REDSKINS!

                Comment

                • #9
                  You mean Bran Brohm?lol
                  Brett Favre in 2 years...sigpic

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    If you trade Rodgers away, it's essentially a waste because it'd destroy his confidence. That's basically Ted Thompson flipping the finger. His sanity will go down the toilet. Whatever team will get him will get a hollow wreck who has no self-confidence. On the flip side, it could always instill him with a sense of vengeance and establish a huge chip on his shoulder, thus making him a sick competitor, but I highly doubt that will happen. Few men can survive three years of waiting only to be shown the door.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Originally posted by MMONTERO View Post
                      I was talking about Brian Brohm.
                      I thought you were talking about Aaron Rodgers. I think all three are our future.

                      Rodgers will dominate 12 years. While this happens Brohm takes overafter those years and becomes the Satchel Paige of the NFL. Flynn, meanwhile, has been hibernating since the end of his second year and plays for 12, just like B and R. 52 years, 4 QB's. Sweet.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Obviously I was talking about Aaron Rodgers. Try to read 3 posts before and after a post u respond to for context.


                        R.I.P. Sean Taylor 1983-2007
                        HAIL TO THE REDSKINS!

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Blazedestin View Post
                          We already know that Rodgers and Favre can't stay in the same building as it's going to be a media clusterf*** and tear the locker room apart. It's also a media debacle if Favre gets traded unless they can get a 1st or 2nd round pick, which isn't happening.

                          However, Rodgers is probably more willing to go to a team like NYJ or Tampa, and would probably command the higher draft pick that the Packers would demand. He may not get the 1st round selection, but I think that this situation is better than any other presented so far.
                          We dont have dance dance revolution soooo........your dumb!
                          Chi-Towns Finest!

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Originally posted by MMONTERO View Post
                            Great idea. Why don't the Packers trade away the future of their franchise for a quarterback with voices in his head telling him to retire when he's playing and play when he retires?
                            I know, it's not a good solution. But think about the locker room morale, specifically for him, if they say "HEY YOU KNOW THAT STARTING GIG YOU HAD LOL JK FAVRE DECIDED TO UNRETIRE FOR THE 435809823TH TIME SRY TRY AGAIN NEXT YR N00B."

                            You think he seriously wants to sit on the bench for one, two, three more seasons? They could train Brohm into the QB of the future.

                            It isn't a good situation for the Packers no matter what the hell they do, short of trading him to Minnesota/TB/NYJ for a 1st rounder.
                            - Also known as Dan.
                            - Also known as the footballclod, where I do my own fantasy football and other football related stuff. -> www.footballclod.wordpress.com

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              They will have open competition in camp. If Favre wins the job, Rodgers will have to accept that he needs to improve.


                              R.I.P. Sean Taylor 1983-2007
                              HAIL TO THE REDSKINS!

                              Comment

                              Previous 1 2 3 template Next
                              Working...
                              X