November 20, 2007 - 1998 Vikings Offense or 2007 Patriots Offense?

[SanchezMVP2009]

I choose the 2007 Patriots.

[Walter]

Good poll idea, I may ask this on my site in the future.

[candyman82]

Pats

[schmidty]

Yea good poll, but i have to go with the Pats....Brady is much better than Cunningham, even though randall had a hell of a season that year. In addition the Pats have a better #3 and tight end than the Vikes. You understand????

[Vikings_All_Day28]

Yea good poll, but i have to go with the Pats....Brady is much better than Cunningham, even though randall had a hell of a season that year. In addition the Pats have a better #3 and tight end than the Vikes. You understand????

You have got to be kidding right? Wes Welker is over-rated due to being Tom brady's favorite target and having Randy Moss. Jake Reed had 4 consecutive 1000 yd seasons before 1998 when he was made a #3... I would take Jake Reed any day over Welker.

It's close but it's the vikings they were a more balanced attack.

Randall Cunningham<<Tom Brady
1998 Randy Moss < 2007 Randy Moss(only since he is a veteran now understands the game better)
Cris Carter>>>>>Donte Stallworth
Jake Reed>>>Wes Welker
Robert Smith>>>Laurence Maroney

Also put it this way, the 1998 Vikes offense produced 7 Pro-bowlers:
QB:Randall Cunningham
WR:Cris Carter
WR:Randy Moss
RB:Robert Smith
OL:Randle McDaniel
OL:Todd Steussie
C:Jeff Christy

The Only 2 patriots that are locks are Tom Brady and Randy Moss after that a couple of Offensive linemen may sneak in but nothing like the Vikes squad.

I think a lot of people are going to be too blinded from seeing the patriots RIGHT NOW to truely remember how great those 98 Vikings were.

[Matt McGuire]

I voted Vikes because I think they have a more balanced offense, and a better OL.

[NoNonsenseCoach]

Vikings All Day really makes it obvious who the better offense is.